Derek's Last Days |
Derek Rocco Barnabei 1967-2000 Innocent Man Murdered by the State of Virginia
|
August 31, 2000 Evidence Missing |
| Evidence has disappeared from the case file of death row inmate Derek Barnabei,
whose request for a review of DNA samples to prove his innocence has generated
international support.
The evidence, believed to be fingernail clippings and
semen collected from the woman Barnabei was accused of raping and killing, was reported
missing on Tuesday from the Norfolk Circuit Court Clerk's office.
Gilmore asked state police to try to determine what happened to the evidence.
The court clerk's office told Gilmore one of Barnabei's investigators, along with a
television crew from the ABC News program ``Nightline,'' had access to the evidence
earlier this month, the governor said.
The investigator, Frank Slaton, denied removing or mishandling the evidence. A
spokeswoman for ``Nightline'' declined comment until more was known about the situation.
Seth Tucker, one of Barnabei's defense attorneys, described the discovery that
evidence was missing from the Norfolk Circuit Court as ``outrageous.''
``If the government of Virginia has lost the DNA evidence in this case, it has an
awful lot of explaining to do,'' he said. ''That would be, in my view, a serious crime.'' |
Tucker Issues a Press Release
|
| Today Governor James Gilmore's office announced that evidence in the Barnabei
case may have been "lost or compromised."
The
Governor's office insinuates that the defense may be responsible for tampering with
evidence. Finally, the Governor concludes
with the statement that the Virginia State Police are investigating the circumstances
under which any evidence may have been compromised.
The Governor's press
release is at best reckless, and at worst intentionally misleading.
It raises questions concerning whether the
Governor's office is more interested in smearing Mr. Barnabei and his defense team than in
learning the truth about Sarah Wisnosky's death.
This
release should not distract our attention from the central issue before the Governor:
Will Virginia test the DNA evidence?
If not, what is Virginia trying to hide?
The truth:
1.
Barnabei's investigator reports that he has never
been alone in the evidence room.
I am told
that this has been confirmed by the Circuit Court.
The
investigator, who had not been in the evidence room at all between 1998 and August 2000,
went to the Circuit Court this month on a few occasions to photograph evidence.
The defense has been reduced to photographing
evidence because the Commonwealth refuses to release evidence to us for examination.
In fact, the Commonwealth even refused to provide
the defense team with photo-quality copies of crime-scene photos that were introduced at
trial. This has hampered our efforts to
investigate the murder and required us to rely on poor-quality photos of photos. If the Commonwealth will not even give us copies
of photos, is it credible to suggest that they would permit the press or the defense to
tamper with hard evidence? More importantly,
Barnabei's
investigator was accompanied at all times by court personnel.
Circuit Court clerk's office personnel accompanied
Barnabei's investigator whenever he was in the presence of evidence from this case.
It is premature and reckless of the Governor's
office to level an accusation against Barnabei's investigator when further investigation
would have demonstrated that it is impossible for him to have compromised evidence in this
case.
2.
The Commonwealth has never released to the
defense the numerous items of genetic material that we have requested.
In June the Attorney General's office wrote to the
defense saying that the Division of Forensic Science had returned "all" of the
genetic material that we want tested "to the submitting agency" (presumably the
Norfolk police, although that was not specified).
If
the genetic materials are missing now, two months later and we should add that the
Governor's office has not indicated which items are missing or compromised
then the real story is why has Virginia lost crucial evidence that could prove that it is
about to execute an innocent man?
If Virginia
has lost that evidence, it would be immoral to proceed with the execution of Derek
Barnabei.
3.
Barnabei and his defense team not only welcome but
demand a full investigation of the circumstances under which any evidence in this case has
been lost or compromised, and we demand that those responsible be identified and brought
to justice.
4.
In light of these new developments and the fact
that the Virginia State Police are now beginning an investigation that could establish
that government officials have lost or compromised evidence in the Barnabei case, we
insist that Governor Gilmore suspend the execution of Derek Barnabei, now scheduled for
September 14, in order for that investigation to be completed.
It is unthinkable that Virginia would proceed with
the execution when it is possible that government officials the only people who
have access to the evidence may have lost or destroyed evidence in the case.
The current execution date does not provide
sufficient time for a full investigation and for serious and responsible review of that
investigation. |
September 1, 2000 Evidence Found
|
| An envelope containing evidence from the murder trial of Derek R. Barnabei, was
found Friday in the Circuit Court Evidence room.
The evidence containing
fingernail clippings and other samples from the victim, Sarah J. Wisnosky, apparently had
been misplaced, authorities said.
The evidence was discovered missing Tuesday when Gov. Jim Gilmore sent police to
retrieve it from the court. Gilmore was reviewing the case to decide whether to order more
DNA testing. |
The World Pleads to the Governor
|
September 2, 2000
The latest twist in Barnabei's saga has drawn the attention of national and international
groups that say the evidence problem shows the case has been mishandled. The Rutherford
Institute, a conservative civil liberties group, called yesterday on the U.S. Justice
Department to "conduct a full investigation and determine whether Commonwealth
officials were responsible." And Ajamu Baraka, acting director of Amnesty
International USA's Program to Abolish the Death Penalty, said: "This incident casts
further grave doubts on the reliability and fairness of Virginia's capital justice system.
. . . A young woman is dead and a man's life is at stake, and what we get from the State
of Virginia is sloppy police investigation, inadequate defense for the accused and
evidence that is missing one day and found the next." |
September 8, 2000 Gilmore Orders Tests
|
| Gilmore asked the Virginia Division of Forensic Science to conduct a DNA analysis
of fingernail clippings taken from Sarah Wisnosky.
Gilmore did not
immediately order a stay of execution for Barnabei, who is scheduled to die on Thursday.
In an interview, Gilmore said he expected the results from the new tests to be
available well ahead of Barnabei's scheduled Sept. 14 execution.
``It is uncertain whether additional DNA tests in this case will advance the ends
of justice,'' Gilmore said in a statement. ``Nevertheless, in an abundance of caution and
fairness, I have directed this additional testing.
``It would be inappropriate at this time to speculate on any potential outcome of
these test or what conclusions might be drawn from them,'' he said.
Andrew A. Protogyrou, one of Barnabei's attorneys, expressed joy and relief at the
news from the governor.
``Wow! Awesome! Now I can go home,'' Protogyrou said, laughing. But he quickly
added that he and his co-counsel need to look at the governor's statement before
commenting further.
Earlier in the day, Barnabei's lawyers filed for an injunction in federal court,
seeking to postpone Barnabei's execution until a judge can determine what happened to
misplaced evidence in the case.
The lawsuit argues that Barnabei's constitutional rights were violated when
crime-scene evidence could not be located last week in the Norfolk Circuit Court.
The missing evidence, which Barnabei said proves his innocence, was found on Sept.
1 in an adjacent chamber of the evidence room, court officials said.
But Barnabei's lawyers believe that the incident suggests the evidence was
tampered with by a state employee intent on sabotaging Barnabei's efforts to prove his
innocence.
``The defendants were repeatedly put on notice that they had to preserve the
integrity of this evidence,'' Barry C. Scheck, co-director of the Innocence Project and
Barnabei legal adviser, wrote in a statement Friday. ``Their failure to do so shows an
intentional disregard for Barnabei's constitutional rights.''
The lawsuit names Virginia Attorney General Mark Earley, Director of Corrections
Ronald J. Angelone, Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Calvin Depew, Norfolk Police Chief
Melvin C. High and Norfolk Clerk of the Circuit Court Al Teich as defendants.
If the judge determines that the evidence is no longer valid to test, Barnabei's
execution should be stopped permanently, the lawsuit argued.
In granting the new tests, Gilmore said that Dr. Paul Ferrara, head of the state
Forensics Science Division, examined the misplaced evidence packets and determined that
they had not been opened.
``Therefore, I have directed Dr. Ferrara to open the evidence envelopes and
perform DNA tests on the fingernail clippings.'' |
Purity of DNA Evidence in Doubt
|
| Late today Governor James S. Gilmore III ordered testing of DNA evidence in the
Derek Barnabei case. Gilmore ordered that the victims bloodstained fingernail
clippings be tested. Barnabei has sought this testing since 1997 in an effort to
prove that he is innocent of the murder of Sarah Wisnosky.
The
Governor ordered the test hours after Barnabeis lawyers filed suit in Federal
court. The lawsuit asks the court either to rule that the evidence that disappeared
from a locked evidence room and mysteriously reappeared days later in another locked room
was still intact and able to be tested, or to bar the Commonwealth of Virginia from
executing Barnabei because of malicious interference with his constitutional rights.
Goldstein and Tucker Barnabeis lawyers allege that all of the evidence points to
deliberate evidence-tampering by one or more government employees.
Barnabeis lawyers also complained they were not allowed to have an
independent observer present at the testing of the clippings.
Walter Felton, counselor to Gilmore, said Paul Ferrara, director of the Virginia
Division of Forensic Science, told him it appeared the ends of the cardboard tube holding
the vaginal swab were "open a bit."
Goldstein said that inside the medical examiner's envelope were three cardboard
containers. One held the nail clippings, one held specimen slides and one held vaginal,
oral and anal swabs.
On learning of the Governors decision to order the test,
Barnabei said, This is fantastic news. Im still very concerned because
some of the evidence, including the fingernails, may have been tampered with. Also
there were over a dozen items that we asked be tested, and the fingernails are only one of
those. But the fingernails are critical evidence and I expect the DNA test to save
my life.
Barnabeis lawyers said that the new development does not
change their strategy. The fingernails are important, but they are not the
whole story. We still need to know what happened when the evidence
disappeared, said Seth Tucker of Covington & Burling. Barnabeis
lawyers said they would continue their court fight to learn the facts of the lost
and found evidence. They also vowed to press to stay Barnabeis
execution. With all that has happened in the last week, we are calling on
Governor Gilmore to order a stay of execution. Derek Barnabei and the people of
Virginia deserve a full explanation, not a rush to judgment, said Linda Goldstein,
also of Covington & Burling. |
September 10, 2000 The World is Stunned
|
| Jacqueline Perkins Writes:
Honorable Governor Gilmore,
The events of the last few days have prompted me to write you again.
Honorable Governor, with all due respect, it appears that you underestimate the
mental capacities of both the people you govern and those of the outside world. I cannot
imagine that a man of your experience would possibly think that you could deceive the
people who trusted you with their votes into thinking that you have taken a sincere
interest in the matters concerning Derek Barnabeis fate. The world is asking where
you could have gotten the idea that by ordering tests on evidence whose authenticity and
wholeness can no longer be trusted, we should conclude that you are making a sincere
effort to carry out your responsibilities.
Honorable Governor, VITAL pieces of evidence in this case have been disappearing
from the police archives from the very beginning. Other vital pieces of information were
deliberately withheld which could change the dynamics of this case dramatically. Four
prosecution witnesses testified that Mr. Barnabei was not at the place of murder at the
time that the prosecution itself established the murder. The very evidence that Mr.
Barnabei requested to have tested HAS NO DOUBT BEEN TAMPERED WITH. ITS VERY DISAPPEARANCE
FROM ITS DESIGNATED STORAGE PLACE RENDERS TEST RESULTS IF NOT HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE,
COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.
As a concerned citizen I ask you personally to stay this execution and to involve
the proper authorities in investigating Sarah Wisnoskys murder more thoroughly. You
have demonstrated extremely poor decision making by ignoring evens which SIMPLY CANNOT BE
IGNORED. I am confident that the people of Virginia will not stand to have their image
damaged by poor leadership, and that you will redeem yourself by both ACKNOWLEDGING YOUR
MISTAKE AND DOING THE RIGHT THING: RESPECT BOTH SARAH WISNOSKYS AND DEREK
BARNABEIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BY INSURING THAT NO DOUBTS AS TO HIS GUILT OR
INNOCENCE ARE LEFT UNEXAMINED.
Sincerely, |
September 11, 2000 Gilmore Issues This Statement
|
| "Last week, in of an abundance of caution, I directed the Virginia Division
of Forensic Science to perform additional DNA tests on fingernail clippings taken from Ms.
Wisnosky's hands. Barnabei, through his attorneys, requested this testing on the theory
that Ms. Wisnosky scratched her attacker as she was choked.
"Pursuant to
an Order of the Norfolk Circuit Court, the evidence envelopes containing Ms. Wisnosky's
fingernails were delivered to the Virginia Division of Forensic Science. Dr. Paul Ferrara,
Director of the Division of Forensic Science, advised me that the fingernail clippings
were received uncompromised, in their original sealed and secured envelopes, one
containing clippings from the left hand and one from the right. Dr. Ferrara further
advised that the envelope seals displayed the initials of the examiner who originally
reviewed the fingernail clippings and secured them in the envelopes. That seal was secure
and unopened. Based on Dr. Ferrara's opinion, I directed DNA tests on the fingernail
clippings to proceed.
"The Division of Forensic Science has concluded its DNA tests and has
presented the test results to me today, September 11, 2000. The new DNA tests reveal that
Ms. Wisnosky's fingernails contained her own DNA and the DNA of one other person. The
Division of Forensic Science ran the DNA profile of the second individual through the
Commonwealth's DNA data bank. The search revealed a positive match with one and only one
individual -- Derek Rocco Barnabei.
"Now that the guilt of Barnabei has been confirmed, there remains the
generalized assault on capital punishment by many in this country and foreign countries. I
believe we are entitled to set a moral standard that violent murder will not be tolerated
by a civilized people. The rule of law requires that at some point the community is
likewise entitled to justice.
"Based upon a thorough review of the DNA test results confirming Barnabei's
guilt, the numerous court decisions in this case, and the circumstances of this matter, I
decline to intervene in the case of Derek Rocco Barnabei." |
Injustice Does Not Go Unnoticed
|
September 11, 2000
Governor Gilmore,
We will grant you that you have a powerful public
relations organization at your disposal, but please don't insult our intelligence by
making such a moral and self-righteous statement against the Italians both abroad and
here.
I have no problems accepting that the people of Virginia have a right to dispense
whatever appropriate punishment they deem proper for crimes. However, that is not the
question here.
At first, after the disappearance of the evidence your office insinuated that
Frank Slaton, Barnabei's investigator, along with Nightline might have been responsible
for the disappearance because Slaton knew that the evidence would point to Barnabei. Well,
let's assume that he was able to make himself invisible and spooked all your clerks and
cameras and got away with it, after all you never proved that he did, are you telling us
that he made himself invisible again and brought back the evidence pointing to Barnabei?
Do you really believe that any sane person would believe this absurdity?
Please answer that Mr.Governor.
Governor Gilmore, the sad reality is that some sinister forces in Virginia want
this case to go away and quickly and it's those same forces that made the envelope
disappear and reappear with evidence of tampering to crucial evidence that could not have
been directly tampered with because they had already been tested and a record existed. The
same was not true for the fingernails and therefore it was easy to manipulate that DNA.
Your experts say that the fingernail envelope was not tampered with. Well, we have heard
people do more difficult things.
Why all this secrecy and speed of this testing? Why has your office not
released DNA testing in the Washington case which was authorized over a month ago and yet
in this case results were obtained at superhuman speed? Why was the defense not
allowed to participate in the testing? Why was the envelope containing the fingernail
clippings destroyed?
Governor Gilmore, I KNOW THIS IS THE LAND OF THE FREE, BUT IT IS NOT THIS KIND OF
FREEDOM TO VIOLATE A PERSON'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT that our forefathers had in mind.
All my adult life I have taken pride in my U.S. citizenship and have many times
found myself defending what it stood for. These last few weeks you have rocked that
foundation of belief that our nation stands for justice and moral correctness.
Believe me, you can sympathize all you want with the victim's family. We feel for
them too, but there is no justice for the victim's family because unless the Federal
Courts step in, your state will execute an innocent man while the true murderers roam
free.
Maybe you don't care, but the BARNABEI case will forever stain your state and give
it an unpleasant page in the history books. I can assure you this will be remembered
as SACCO AND VANZETTI #2 and it happened during your tenure.
Governor Gilmore, we all have to live with our decisions and you will have to with
this tragic one. Man can alter the course of justice on this earth but will be
powerless before God's judgement.
TONY DI PIAZZA |
September 13, 2000 DNA Test in Barnabei Case Was Not Proof of Guilt
|
| Amy Levine - Barnabei Attorney
On Monday of this
week, Governor Gilmore's office issued a press release announcing the results of a DNA
test of evidence in the Derek Barnabei case. The Governor's office said that
"the new DNA tests reveal that Ms. Wisnosky's fingernails contained her own DNA and
the DNA of one other person
Derek Rocco Barnabei."
The Governor continued, "This DNA test result confirms that
Derek Rocco Barnabei is guilty."
These statements were misleading What the Governor's
office failed to tell you, and what we learned only yesterday, was that there were two
tests. The first test was run on bloodstained fingernails. These fingernails,
from Ms. Wisnosky's left hand, contained only her DNA. There is nothing in that test
that suggests guilt on Barnabei's part.
The second test was from the victim's right fingernails, and
that test showed the presence of Barnabei's DNA. But the fingernails on Ms.
Wisnosky's right hand were not bloodstained. In fact, a July 9, 1994 report from the
Division of Forensic Science revealed blood only on the left hand. Because the DNA
came from some source other than blood, it has no bearing on Barnabei's guilt or
innocence. They were a couple, and were admittedly in an intimate relationship.
The presence of a few skin cells or hair follicles is meaningless.
Everyone who follows this case knew about the bloody fingernail,
and we expected to find the killer's blood there. It turns out that was a blind
alley. But the Governor's statement that Barnabei's DNA was found on "Ms.
Wisnosky's fingernails" was an attempt to lead the citizens of Virginia to think that
it was Barnabei's blood.
Even today, the Governor's office told at least one reporter
that Barnabei's blood was on the fingernails. When they were challenged, the
Governor's office later retracted that statement and said they would have to get more
information.
These are not minor details. A man's life is at stake.
The people of Virginia deserve better than half-truths and blatant falsehoods from
the Governor's office in a death penalty case. Whether these misleading statements
were intentional or not is not the point. The point is that this matter involves the
taking of a human life. The government must tell the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth.
The fact is that the new tests shed no new light on the events
of September 21 and 22, 1993. But there is more evidence that could do so.
We call on Governor Gilmore to test the other evidence in the
Barnabei case and to stay the execution until all of the evidence can be tested. |
September 13, 2000 Nothing Moves the Governor
|
September 13, 2000
From Jacqueline Perkins
Honorable Governor Gilmore,
What can we think?
What conclusions can we come to?
Perhaps you simply know something that the rest of the world doesnt know.
Perhaps you have connections or extremely reliable sources which make you BELIEVE, I dare
say even KNOW beyond any doubt whatsoever that Derek Barnabei is guilty of the crime he is
going to be executed for. I must give you the benefit of this doubt.
If you do not have connections or sources that allow you to know beyond a
reasonable doubt that Mr. Barnabei is guilty, then we can only assume that you are simply
quite convinced that he is. In either case, your decision making reflects that
you deemed it unnecessary to investigate further into why the sealed envelope
was not in its original storage place. As children of a nation where a great portion of
its people was convinced that John F. Kennedy was killed by one magic bullet,
we should just as easily forget how simple it is to re-glue a seal, or camouflage
tampering of an envelope that appeared to be sealed. Evidently you ruled out this
possibility, and we concerned citizens should just trustingly accept the destruction of
this envelope afterwards with no explanation. Furthermore, we should also accept the fact
that there was nothing strange or of any importance in that another container appeared to
have been opened. I will continue assuming that you simply know something that the rest of
the world doesnt, because believe me, while you and your advisors find all of this
natural enough to continue following through with the execution of a man, the WORLD-WIDE
OPINION OF THESE EVENTS DOES NOT.
It is obvious to me that the family and supporters of Mr. Barnabei believe in his
case enough to continue this battle no matter what happens on September 14. As far as my
support is concerned, I will continue following the developments and writing letters to
keep INFORMING people on what has really happened. I am the first to admit that I am not
100% convinced that Mr. Barnabei is innocent, BUT I AM BY NO MEANS CONVINCED THAT HE IS
GUILTY. I am also 100% sure that I will not regret my involvement and support of his case
in any way. Perhaps you will be lucky, Mr. Governor, that your instincts (if
thats what they are) regarding Mr. Barnabeis guilt turn out to be right: I am
taking for granted that with your history as prosecutor (and consequent expert knowledge
of criminal prosecution in general), you are fully aware of all the affidavits of expert
forensic consultants, witnesses, and documented papers outlining inconsistencies of
prosecution testimony and mysterious disappearance of vital evidence that support the
defenses version of the events. It is MY opinion is that there are too many strange
circumstances revolving around this case to order the execution of a man, and that your
decision making must be based on other elements.
Therefore, if it does turn out that Mr. Barnabei is innocent, I will unite with
others in a campaign like Virginia has never seen in its history to help restore justice
where political games, and perhaps even corruption, had taken its place. You will not be
able to hide behind claims of not knowing or not thinking, because
we will have acknowledgement of your letters as proof that you had many opportunities to
think more carefully on this issue through the help of public opinion. I will direct my
voice to your voters and invest every second of my spare time making sure that they know
the dynamics of this case thoroughly before they return to the polls, wherever you intend
to continue your political career. I strongly recommend that you reconsider your stand on
this issue. If nothing else, I demand an official statement on what procedures were used
to determine whether or not the envelopes had been tampered with (Im sure you
didnt just look at them) and above all who ordered that the one
containing fingernails be destroyed minutes after examining its contents.
If those of us who are net yet convinced of Mr.Barnabeis guilt end up
determining beyond any reasonable doubt that he is indeed guilty we will certainly pay the
due moral consequences. I will be the first to extend a formal apology to the
Wisnosky family with a detailed explanation of why I followed up bad judgement with
concrete actions. I hope that after reviewing the letters which I have written on Mr.
Barnabeis behalf, they would understand.
I am at peace with my conscience, Mr. Governor. Are you?
|
All Appeals Fail
|
| On Wednesday, the last avenues of appeal began to close for Barnabei. The 4th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's refusal Tuesday to stop the
execution. The courts dismissed defense arguments that the state tampered with evidence
and that more DNA tests should be done because of the unexplained disappearance and
reappearance of evidence at the Norfolk Circuit Court.
Barnabei's attorneys,
who planned to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, argued that the disappearance of evidence
from a locked room from Aug. 29 to Sept. 1 breached his constitutional rights. Gov. Jim
Gilmore ordered a Virginia State Police investigation that is continuing.
But Gilmore said he will not stay Barnabei's execution, adding that DNA tests on
the misplaced evidence further proved his guilt. |
September 14, 2000 There is No Turning Back
|
| Governor Gilmore,
In light of the underhanded "slight of hand
trick" by your public relation machine where they misled your people by not only
implying but outright lying about the DNA results, claiming that the positive DNA was from
the bloody fingernail, I once again ask that you reassess your position and STOP this
madness.
I have been involved in community activism, which also involves political
activism, and I KNOW what drives politics and decision making very well. You KNOW what I
mean.
You were elected to make difficult, non-political decisions and you can do this by
rising above it all and stopping this unjust rush to judgement.
As I have previously mentioned, I have been always a registered republican and so
are most Italian-Americans. This case has so incensed our community that if this execution
goes through I will consider starting a nationwide drive for change of party affiliation
to the democratic party immediately. I will also see to it that George Bush Jr. is
informed of this drive immediately.
I just can't stay in a party anymore that boasts morality while at the same time
hands over justice to special interests and disregards due process for the people they
were elected to protect.
Governor Gilmore, unless you stop this this execution and unless the supreme court
steps in, tonight I will go to sleep with sadness in my heart for what you and the people
of Virginia have done to an innocent man. I will also be at peace with myself knowing I
have done all I could to stop this madness on the part of you and your people. YOU AND ALL
VIRGINIANS WILL LIVE WITH THIS STAIN FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIVES AND HOPE AND PRAY YOU WILL
HAVE MANY SLEEPLESS NIGHTS.
For me, I will be a little wiser than Derek and WILL NEVER SET FOOT IN VIRGINIA
EVER AGAIN.
TONY DI PIAZZA |
The Supreme Court Turns Down Appeal
|
| U.S. Supreme Court twice refused to grant a stay in the case that was closely
followed in Italy. |
``I don't want to die and it's unjust that I die. If this is what God wants, then so be
it. I accept it. Who am I to question the ultimate design?''
|
| At a final family meeting at the prison, Derek told his brother and mother Jane
to ``to go on with our lives and fight,'' Craig Barnabei said.
``I hope this
is not for nothing,'' Craig Barnabei quoted his brother as saying. ``I hope people take a
hard look at my case.''
Barnabei also wanted his body cremated, but his mother talked him out of it, his
brother said.
About two hours before the execution, Barnabei wrote out a will by hand. Andy
Protogyrou, one of Barnabei's attorneys, declined to identify Barnabei's beneficiaries.
Earlier Thursday, Barnabei's lawyers filed a clemency petition with Gov. Jim
Gilmore, even though the governor had said Monday that he would not grant clemency because
new DNA testing confirmed Barnabei was guilty.
``Serious doubts still surround this case,'' lawyer Seth A. Tucker said in the
petition filed Wednesday. He argued that Barnabei should not be executed while a state
police investigation continues into a temporary disappearance of evidence in the case.
``It would do a disservice not only to Derek Barnabei, but also to the people of
the Commonwealth of Virginia, to continue with an execution when there is still no
conclusion as to who moved the evidence, what they did with it, and why,'' Tucker wrote.
Gilmore said Thursday that he is sure nobody tampered with the evidence that was
tested -- Wisnosky's fingernail clippings, which were in a sealed envelope that had not
been opened.
He also said plenty of other evidence was considered at trial and in Barnabei's
appeals.
``We can't retry cases in the governor's office,'' Gilmore told reporters. |
Legal Murder in America
|
September 15, 2000 An innocent man was executed in America last night, and nobody noticed.
|
|
On Thursday night, September 14, P.M. I cranked up my computer to write an article about
the Barnabei case. I wasnt sure what kind of article. He was supposed to be executed
in Virginia at 9:00 P.M. We all hoped for a miracle, so I waited for events to unfold. At
9:06 my phone rang. I picked it up feverishly, hoping that whoever was calling was going
to give me the good news for which I had been praying for months. Alas, the opposite was
true: one of my friends, who gets Italian television, was calling me to tell me that Derek
Rocco Barnabei had just been executed. The execution was scheduled for 9:00 P.M. Virginia
doesnt fool around. We had to hear it from Italian television, because in the land
of the free and the home of the brave nobody cared. After all, he was only an Eye-talian:
not even a mafioso!
Ironically, earlier in the evening I had put the finishing touches to a story on the death
of Tommaso Natale, that took place on October 28, 1943, in Italy. Its a chapter in a
book Im writing about WWII. Tommaso was shot by a Nazi soldier just because he had
not obeyed his order to halt. He was shot in the back. That Nazi had no more right to give
orders to an Italian civilian in his own land, much less shoot him, than Gov. James
Gilmore of Virginia had to execute Derek Rocco Barnabei. In America a man is presumed
innocent until proven guilty, right? Wrong! The Commonwealth of Virginia apparently makes
its own rules: its prosecutors failed to link Derek to the murder of seventeen year old
Sarah Wisnosky. Yet, the jury not only found him guilty, but they condemned him to death.
Four appeals were denied despite the plight of the Italian people and Parliament, the
European Parliament, the Pope and an entire array of famous people including Richard Gere
for a stay of execution. Alan Dershowitz, of O.J. fame, who picked up the case in its late
stages, said: The Barnabei case represents one of the most egregious miscarriages of
justice, and one of the most compelling cases of innocence Ive ever seen
But, Virginia was immovable. At the time of actually putting him to death, the justice
system in the United States demands that every possible evidence be exhausted before
injecting the poison in a body that would then be dead forever. Virginia, with a mountain
of evidence at hand (most of them mishandled anyway), but inadmissible because
not presented within 21 days, kills a man who was not a hardened criminal and who
consistently cried out his innocence. Nazi Germany had nothing on Virginia.
Even more disturbing is the fact that it was Italian television (Barnabei was half
Italian, but the Italians of Siena were the only ones to set up a subscription and funded
most of his defense) that announced Dereks demise immediately because its cameras
were on the spot: American media were totally silent. The only newspaper that dedicated an
article to the case was the Philadelphia Inquirer, on Sept. 3, 2000, but it reeked of
sarcasm about Italy making martyrs of felons in death row. Even the day after, an article
in the Inquirer by Jeffrey Fleishman, admitted that the execution drew scant
attention in the United States, and focused more on the Italian reaction to it. Yes,
Mr. Fleishman, Derek Barnabei was only an Eye-talian after all. Imagine those stupid
Italians holding a vigil at the Colosseum? Dont they have a sit-com to watch on TV
or something? Egads! Never mind that as an American citizen, Mr. Barnabeis
constitutional rights had been brutally violated in a criminal manner.
After the announcement came that Derek
was indeed dead, I put on CNN all night, but they didnt say a word. KYW News Radio,
didnt mention it nor did local newspapers even announced Dereks death. The
Italian American community (which has been stripped of its identity these days anyway),
was nowhere to be found. Gone are the Little Italys of America, and with them any
sort of solidarity, if there ever was one, has been lost forever. Of course, with the
media ignoring the case, the average Italian-American didnt even know about it. But,
what about the Italian-American fraternal organizations, and the foundations, and the
institutes? And the intelligentsia at various universities throughout America, where were
they? Every year they take the Sacco and Vanzetti case out of mothballs, they blow the
dust off of it, and talk about it for an evening. Then they put it back for another year
just like they do with the statues of various saints that they parade around towns because
of traditions, even though these days the traditional neighborhoods are nothing but ghost
towns. Yet, they allowed another case, even more flagrant to take place right under their
noses. Derek who? Barnabei? How do you spell that? Give me a break!
And, where were the Italian American politicians, who at election times join in those
procession: (to get votes, not to express their faith)? The Torricellis
(Dereks own senator), the Santorums, the Cuomos. Where was the Church,
the Archbishop of Philadelphia, himself being of Italian discent (especially considering
that Dereks mother is a graduate of Overbrook High School, hence a Philadelphian),
where was His Eminence? More poignantly, where was Antonine Scalia? Fishing? After all,
the Supreme Court of the United States had the last say. I challenge any of the above
named, politicians, especially Judge Scalia, to write to me and show me the criterion that
proved to them that Derek was guilty! As an American citizen, I have the constitutional
right to know. If they cant do that, then theyre all just as guilty of
legalized murder as Gilmore is.
Im not going into details about the case, but if anyone would like to read more
about it, the family, who lives in Somers Point, N.J., has a web page at the following
internet address: www.barnabei.com. Everything is there.
American Citizens, read it, and tremble!
When I taught English at Bishop Kenrick
High School, I used to teach the jury system of justice as it exists in the United States.
I was idealistic then: I thought that in America justice will prevail in all cases.
Isnt that funny? Thats what Derek thought, too! I used to turn the classroom
into a court room. The operative, ever recurring concept was: reasonable doubt. A person
accused of a crime in America is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the burden of
proof rests with the State. Culpability must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt,
otherwise the jury MUST return a Not Guilty verdict. The Barnabei case was not only
replete with reasonable doubt, but it reeked with judicial irregularities,
(and Im being mild here). The judge, the DA, even the Supreme Court of Virginia, and
those who had anything to do with the case, all exhibited questionable attitudes.
Its all on the internet. Read all about it! This case should have been thrown out of
court the second day of trial.
So, how, how, how does a sovereign State, a member of the original thirteen, which figured
so pre-eminently in establishing the one nation, under God, with liberty and justice
for all, how does a political entity of such historical stature sink so low as to
put an innocent man to death? And how does it happen that everyone else in the United
States has his head in the sand and ignored the whole sorry mess, even while the whole of
Europe has been in an uproar about it for a couple of years?
Going back to the case of Tommaso
Natale (cousin of Judge Sebastian Natale of Dauphin County, Pa.), I see no difference
between the two events. In fact, the last time I ever saw such a degree of official
arrogance as exhibited by Gov. Gilmore in the Barnabei case, was when I lived under the
Nazis, in Italy. If they accused a person of a crime (against the Nazis of
course), there was no recourse that had any weight: he was summarily shot. Much like Gov.
Gilmore said: I say he did it, and thats that. In both cases, moral and
State law were violated. Hitler was crazy, but whats your excuse, Gilmore?
An Italian newspaper this morning called the USA, the country of death, and
Im afraid that the assessment was tragically correct. In America, these days,
were killing unborn babies by the millions, killing on the streets is a daily
occurrence, killing in the schools of students by students has dipped as low as the level
of the first grade, and now were killing innocent people under the aegis of
righteousness. Virginia has rejected the appeals of the Italian Parliament, of the
European Parliament, and even the Pope with a resounding raspberry, and at 9:00 P.M. they
proceeded, with impunity and hubristic arrogance, to eliminate an innocent man.
The realities of modern America flies
in the face of the idealistic dream of Thomas Jefferson, ironically the quintessential
Virginian, (and of his friend, the Florentine, Dr. Filippo Mazzei who suggested much of
the contents of the Declaration of Independence, to him! Barnabei was of Tuscan origin,
too). This is not what Jefferson had in mind. Bloody, bloody America, you are morally
bankrupt!
An innocent man was executed last night in America, and nobody noticed!
Donato A. De Simone Trooper, Pa. |
``I am truly innocent of this crime,'' ``Eventually the truth will come out.'' "I love you Mom, I love you Craig, I Love you Fabrizio, I Love you Patrizia, I love you Tony."
|
Top of Page
|